Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Randall, Ashley K.; Leon, Gabriel; Basili, Emanuele; Martos, Tamas; Boiger, Michael; Baldi, Michela; Hocker, Lauren; Kline, Kai; Masturzi, Alessio; Aryeetey, Richmond; Bar-Kalifa, Eran; Boon, Susan D.; Botella, Luis; Burke, Tom; Carnelley, Katherine B.; Carr, Alan; Dash, Arobindu; Fitriana, Mimi; Gaines, Stanley O.; Jr.; Galdiolo, Sarah; Hart, Claire M.; Joo, Susanna; Kanth, Barani; Karademas, Evangelos; Karantzas, Gery; Landolt, Selina A.; McHugh, Louise; Milek, Anne; Murphy, Eddie; Natividade, Jean C.; Portugal, Alda; Quinones, Alvaro; Relvas, Ana Paula; Rumondor, Pingkan C.; Rusu, Petruta; Sallay, Viola; Saul, Luis Angel; Schmitt, David P.; Sels, Laura; Shujja, Sultan; Taylor, Laura K.; Ozguluk, S.; Verhofstadt, Leslie; Yoo, Gyesook; Zemp, Martina; Donato, Silvia; Totenhagen, Casey J.; van Eickels, Rahel L.; Adil, Adnan; Anaba, Emmanuel Anongeba; Asampong, Emmanuel; Beauchemin-Roy, Sarah; Berry, Anna; Brassard, Audrey; Chesterman, Susan; Ferguson, Lizzie; Fonseca, Gabriela; Gaugue, Justine; Geonet, Marie; Hermesch, Neele; Abdul Wahab Khan, Rahmattullah Khan; Knox, Laura; Lafontaine, Marie-France; Lawless, Nicholas; Londero-Santos, Amanda; Major, Sofia; Marot, Tiago A.; Mullins, Ellie; Otermans, Pauldy C.; Pagani, Ariela F.; Parise, Miriam; Parvin, Roksana; De, Mallika; Peloquin, Katherine; Rebelo, Barbara; Righetti, Francesca; Romano, Daniel; Salavati, Sara; Samrock, Steven; Serea, Mary; Seok, Chua Bee; Sotero, Luciana; Stafford, Owen; Thomadakis, Christoforos; Topcu-Uzer, Cigdem; Ugarte, Carla; Low, Wah Yun; Simon-Zambori, Petra; Siau, Ching Sin; Duca, Diana-Sinziana; Filip, Cornelia; Park, Hayoung; Wearen, Sinead; Bodenmann, Guy; Chiarolanza, Claudia.
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships ; 39(1):3-33, 2022.
Article in English | APA PsycInfo | ID: covidwho-2277720

ABSTRACT

[Correction Notice: An Erratum for this article was reported in Vol 39(1) of Journal of Social and Personal Relationships (see record 2022-18336-005). Three new authors (Adnan Adil, Emmanuel Asampong, and Rahmattullah Khan Abdul Wahab Khan) were not initially listed in the Epub ahead of print. Table 1 also contained some errors. The corrections are given in the erratum.] Following the global outbreak of COVID-19 in March 2020, individuals report psychological distress associated with the "new normal"-social distancing, financial hardships, and increased responsibilities while working from home. Given the interpersonal nature of stress and coping responses between romantic partners, based on the systemic transactional model this study posits that perceived partner dyadic coping may be an important moderator between experiences of COVID-19 psychological distress and relationship quality. To examine these associations, self-report data from 14,020 people across 27 countries were collected during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic (March-July, 2020). It was hypothesized that higher symptoms of psychological distress would be reported post-COVID-19 compared to pre-COVID-19 restrictions (Hypothesis 1), reports of post-COVID-19 psychological distress would be negatively associated with relationship quality (Hypothesis 2), and perceived partner DC would moderate these associations (Hypothesis 3). While hypotheses were generally supported, results also showed interesting between-country variability. Limitations and future directions are presented. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)

2.
Randall, Ashley K.; Leon, Gabriel, Basili, Emanuele, Martos, Tamás, Boiger, Michael, Baldi, Michela, Hocker, Lauren, Kline, Kai, Masturzi, Alessio, Aryeetey, Richmond, Bar-Kalifa, Eran, Boon, Susan D.; Botella, Luis, Burke, Tom, Carnelley, Katherine, Carr, Alan, Dash, Arobindu, Fitriana, Mimi, Gaines, Stanley O.; Galdiolo, Sarah, Claire M, Hart, Joo, Susanna, Kanth, Barani, Karademas, Evangelos, Karantzas, Gery, Landolt, Selina A.; McHugh, Louise, Milek, Anne, Murphy, Eddie, Natividade, Jean C.; Portugal, Alda, Quiñones, Álvaro, Relvas, Ana Paula, Rumondor, Pingkan C. B.; Rusu, Petruta, Sallay, Viola, Saul, Luis Angel, Schmitt, David P.; Sels, Laura, Shujja, Sultan, Taylor, Laura K.; Ozguluk, S. Burcu, Verhofstadt, Leslie, Yoo, Gyesook, Zemp, Martina, Donato, Silvia, Totenhagen, Casey J.; van Eickels, Rahel L.; Anaba, Emmanuel Anongeba, Beauchemin-Roy, Sarah, Berry, Anna, Brassard, Audrey, Chesterman, Susan, Ferguson, Lizzie, Fonseca, Gabriela, Gaugue, Justine, Geonet, Marie, Hermesch, Neele, Knox, Laura, Lafontaine, Marie-France, Lawless, Nicholas, Londero-Santos, Amanda, Major, Sofia, Marot, Tiago A.; Mullins, Ellie, Otermans, Pauldy C. J.; Ariela F, Pagani, Parise, Miriam, Parvin, Roksana, De, Mallika, Péloquin, Katherine, Rebelo, Bárbara, Righetti, Francesca, Romano, Daniel, Salavati, Sara, Samrock, Steven, Serea, Mary, Seok, Chua Bee, Sotero, Luciana, Stafford, Owen, Thomadakis, Christoforos, Topcu-Uzer, Cigdem, Ugarte, Carla, Yun, Low Wah, Simon-Zámbori, Petra, Siau, Ching Sin, Duca, Diana-Sînziana, Filip, Cornelia, Park, Hayoung, Wearen, Sinead, Bodenmann, Guy, Chiarolanza, Claudia.
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships ; : 02654075211034236, 2021.
Article in English | Sage | ID: covidwho-1374048

ABSTRACT

Following the global outbreak of COVID-19 in March 2020, individuals report psychological distress associated with the ?new normal??social distancing, financial hardships, and increased responsibilities while working from home. Given the interpersonal nature of stress and coping responses between romantic partners, based on the systemic transactional model this study posits that perceived partner dyadic coping may be an important moderator between experiences of COVID-19 psychological distress and relationship quality. To examine these associations, self-report data from 14,020 people across 27 countries were collected during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic (March?July, 2020). It was hypothesized that higher symptoms of psychological distress would be reported post-COVID-19 compared to pre-COVID-19 restrictions (Hypothesis 1), reports of post-COVID-19 psychological distress would be negatively associated with relationship quality (Hypothesis 2), and perceived partner DC would moderate these associations (Hypothesis 3). While hypotheses were generally supported, results also showed interesting between-country variability. Limitations and future directions are presented.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL